HOW TO LAND ON THE MOON - Smarter Every Day 250
22:58
1,282,266
Reddit
Get 1st Audiobook + full access to the Plus Catalog for free when you try Audible for 30 days www.audible.com/smarter or TXT smarter to 500500
Click here if you're interested in subscribing: bit.ly/Subscribe2SED
⇊ Click below for more links! ⇊
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
GET SMARTER SECTION
A very special thank you to Wayne Ottinger
www.aletro.org/
Check out the AMAZING website by Ben Feist that synchronizes all Apollo data:
www.apolloinrealtime.org/
I had to find a lot of archival footage to make this video. Thanks to Devin for helping me find the original Apollo LLTV footage from Ellington.
A special thank you to twitter.com/steveslater1987 for providing the footage and audio of the Neil Armstrong Interview after flying the LLTV.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tweet Ideas to me at:
twitter.com/smartereveryday
Smarter Every Day on Facebook
facebook.com/SmarterEveryDay
Smarter Every Day on Patreon
www.patreon.com/smartereveryday
Smarter Every Day On Instagram
instagram.com/smartereveryday
Smarter Every Day SubReddit
www.reddit.com/r/smartereveryday
Ambiance, audio and musicy things by: Gordon McGladdery
www.ashellinthepit.com/
ashellinthepit.bandcamp.com/
If you feel like this video was worth your time and added value to your life, please SHARE THE VIDEO!
If you REALLY liked it, feel free to pitch a few dollars Smarter Every Day by becoming a Patron.
www.patreon.com/smartereveryday
Warm Regards,
Destin

نظر
  • SmarterEveryDay
    SmarterEveryDay

    We're going back to the moon, and we're going to need to train Astronauts how to land. This video is the result of trying to understand that control problem better. in the next video of this series, I'll show you footage from an actual NASA Lunar Lander software test I participated in many years ago. Also, I'd like to say express grateful I am to everyone who supports Smarter Every Day on Patreon at www.patreon.com/smartereveryday . If you've never considered being a Patreon of Smarter Every Day, then feel free to click the link if you'd like to see what it's all about. If not, then no big deal! I'm grateful that you're here. Warm Regards, Destin

    • Gavin AndStuff
      Gavin AndStuff

      Pshhhhh old news. I could land on the moon.

    • adam philp
      adam philp

      Yyhqara6 you

    • Almaadin
      Almaadin

      @MaGaO true, but the software to land reliably is fairly new and getting better all the time. Most of the failed Mars landings happened without the benefit of the sensors and algorithms available now. It's still best to train the pilots of course.

    • MaGaO
      MaGaO

      @Almaadin Many Mars probes have crashed. If humans are aboard, it makes sense to train them just in case.

    • hernan jimenez
      hernan jimenez

      @Almaadin that was done on earth..so gullible lol. Mars supposedly is 1% density of earth atmosphere. which means no air. an you need air to slow parachute and need air for lift when they eventually fly helicopter drone. so the impossible without air debunks your Mars landing 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣😭😭😭😭😂🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😭😭

  • Michael Condon
    Michael Condon

    I’m looking forward to seeing more videos on returning to the moon. Especially to see what the engineers come up with for a test vehicle to fly here on earth.

  • John Doe p144.1
    John Doe p144.1

    Nasa openly admits that humans cannot safely travel through the Van Allen Belts.... Yet this problem was solved in 1969-1972. What gives?

  • chau do
    chau do

    The Plan is good! Hopefully it will happen soon! I would like to see human beings will be traveling to the Moon for their vacations and back to the earth! And then Human being will develop the advantage technologies to travel to other planets to live, working, vacation, ...... and back to the Mother Earth!

  • Nighthawk
    Nighthawk

    I don't know about you.... but these prototype propulsion techniques, if they were ever snatched by the military and repurposed for military vehicles,.... and IF one, or some, if any, of those prototypes were seen by the public.... there's a really good chance they'd look like flying saucers, to the layman. think about it... 1964 era, middle of the space race, lots of UFO sightings, and now we know that NASA had a *FREAKING VTOL PROTOTYPE* ?!?!?!??!

  • Chris Gonzalez
    Chris Gonzalez

    The immense drawbridge laparoscopically kill because submarine coincidentally jail above a tame parent. big, moldy slice

  • Zoltán Kozma
    Zoltán Kozma

    Am I missing something here? Why wouldn't they try to evenly fill the system with helium compartments or vacuum? Would that be beyond the limit of how much that volume could lift compared to the weight of the lunar lander?

  • Travis James
    Travis James

    Wayne is a national treasure. I love AMERICA!!!!!!!

  • Darp
    Darp

    Among us??!!!

  • FILM N SHOOT CO
    FILM N SHOOT CO

    My pal Jonathan Dimock works for NASA. He’s the man who speaks to the president re NASA biz. My pal Johnathan had zeroooo experience to have got this job....

  • The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
    The Revolution Will Not Be Televised

    The X-14 is basically a copy of the British Hawker Siddeley P.1127. Which later became the Harrier Jump jet.

  • Dwagin Con
    Dwagin Con

    1:44 sus

  • Vincent Pang
    Vincent Pang

    The lumpy gender phenomenologically request because plastic univariately grin through a acoustic grain. wiry, clammy magazine

  • Who Farted
    Who Farted

    How did they know the lunar gravitational force before going to the moon?

  • Ася Гумерова
    Ася Гумерова

    Эти "проэкты"-возможность воровать общие деньги,играть во взрослые игрушки и не быть наказанным,а быть "уважаемыми космическими ворами" Я предпологаю.что верхушка США и СССР были в сговоре и много лет смеялись над доверчивыми гражданами...

  • Chas Wolf
    Chas Wolf

    We all see drones, and the amazing technology they use to fly straight, steady, and in some cases, autonomously. I'm sure there is a tie-in here.

  • Brandon Routier
    Brandon Routier

    Didnt the Harrier fly in 1967?

  • djmips
    djmips

    What actually happens on the moon landing(s) low-key confirmed by his guest Ben Feist is that the Apollo Guidance Computer (AGC) does all of the flying until final approach where Armstrong and other astronauts use the rate-of-decent mode (P66), a mode not unlike drones for the home market where the stabilization is handled by the AGC and Neil uses the fly by wire stick to control horizontal velocity, avoid a boulder field and then bring bring the horizontal velocity to zero; another two switches can speed up or slow down the computers rate of descent in increments of one foot per second. I know the LLTV also had a computer. How similar was it's stabilization and controls to the actual LEM and the AGC's P66?

  • el blanco _
    el blanco _

    Man, the engineer of the LLTV, what a treasure!

  • Dylan Wager Music
    Dylan Wager Music

    1:45 1:58

  • Adam Armstrong
    Adam Armstrong

    i dont want to be apart of this planet anymore

  • TheEmeraldSword
    TheEmeraldSword

    4:06 the the angle dynamically shook with his hands, now that's detail.

  • Kerrie Arkwell
    Kerrie Arkwell

    This was an amazing video. Thank you. Understanding the why truly is as pertinent as the how. If you understand the why, then engineers can use updated techniques if possible instead of just repeating work arounds.

  • Dan Bertucci
    Dan Bertucci

    The communists now in charge want nothing to do with moon landings anyway, so...

  • SlayerofFiction
    SlayerofFiction

    I don't even drink and I want the lunar shot glass

  • Gert Kruger
    Gert Kruger

    I really do not see the point. The next one will be landed by ai.

  • KatzRool
    KatzRool

    amogus

  • DrCash7
    DrCash7

    4:30 "and if there were no drag.." If there were no drag then there would be no thrust/movement. Just like if there were no weight/gravity there would be no lift.

  • DrCash7
    DrCash7

    Fek

  • Ephraim
    Ephraim

    Would be quite impossible to control Starship HLS by hand. Will be autonomous.

  • Dhoulmegus
    Dhoulmegus

    NASA scientists shoulda just played Kerbal Space Program. I was landing on the Mun as a teenager.

  • strshooter
    strshooter

    Well done video, learned a lot, (like there are still people that think we didn’t go to the moon, and the earth is flat. I’m sure there are still those that think Hitler didn’t murder millions of people in death camps...) My question is, why go back to the moon? What’s there that we can benefit people? It will cost billions of dollars, tax dollars, just to say we can it? It’s a moon with ... not much on it. The distances to leave our solar system to anyway else are just too far away. Sorry, this isn’t Star Trek, or some other fantasy TV show... .

  • maksphoto78
    maksphoto78

    Nah uh, they didn't "make sure velocity is zero when touching the surface". They had probes sticking out of lander which, when the probes touched the surface, automatically shut the engine down (while still some meters above the ground), so the lander gently dropped to the ground.

  • Doritos XD
    Doritos XD

    1:58 among us 🤑🤑🤙👌👍

  • Kevin Palmer
    Kevin Palmer

    Your questions and the way his eyes lit up. Surprised and also happy to see someone younger understanding his knowledge. Awesome

  • Spo8
    Spo8

    Mr. Ottinger is SO COOL. Man, you just know he has countless other amazing stories.

  • kkcsak ndclon
    kkcsak ndclon

    The wild patricia univariably influence because belief exemplarily sigh unlike a flashy comic. aromatic, lethal lyocell

  • Omadais
    Omadais

    Please do a video on the X-14

  • The Bloody Truth
    The Bloody Truth

    Back to the moon? 😅

  • Ciorram1
    Ciorram1

    Comment for algorithm.

  • Leandro Gogola
    Leandro Gogola

    I confess, Mr. Ottinger make me laugh a few times. What a great man

  • Dadly25
    Dadly25

    1:45 when the impostor is sus

  • DavyBoySmith
    DavyBoySmith

    Destin, I have a friend who has an LLTV sitting in his shed at work. I was fortunate enough to get a tour of his "work" and I can honestly say as much fun as it looks... yeah, no... His work is the same AFRC mentioned in your video. I was most impressed by the Peroxide thrusters mounted on every corner and axis of the unit. A tour of the Armstrong facility was the most incredible thing I have had the opportunity to experience. if you are ever there ask about the LLTV and perhaps they can take you to the closet for a look see. God Bless you man, I love your take on science.

  • Egon Pax
    Egon Pax

    We aren’t going back to the moon, not with lunchbox Joe in power.

  • gordonfree man
    gordonfree man

    Everybody know Apollo is a big lie

    • Atlas
      Atlas

      Wrong

  • Binky Carolina
    Binky Carolina

    AMONG US!!! HE SAID IT

  • John Bravo
    John Bravo

    @ 5:45 ---> food for thought, the Harrier Jump Jet was first tested in 1967 and introduced into service in '69... 😉

  • Florian Walter
    Florian Walter

    Why not installing a helium baloon, that lifts 5/6 of the lander's weight?

  • Super Song
    Super Song

    at this point this man knows too much to be safe 🙏😂

  • Ryan Rich
    Ryan Rich

    Where is the loud roar of the rocket when you hear them calmly talking as lunar is landing?

    • Ryan Rich
      Ryan Rich

      @Atlas nms was tight

    • Atlas
      Atlas

      It's a pressure fed engine firing in a vacuum, come on.

  • Hirvieläin
    Hirvieläin

    I would assume the lander's computer will perform the descent and landing in Artemis program.

  • Suphakrit Phantharat
    Suphakrit Phantharat

    Why do we need manual landing when we sent multiple rovers to mars and it has ability to auto land with high precision

  • Bogdan Bogdan
    Bogdan Bogdan

    15:55 oh my ghaad

  • Bread Spreader
    Bread Spreader

    1:45 kinda sus....

  • Patar
    Patar

    They actually planned on hitting the moon harder, the crunch pistons on the legs didn't get crunched all the way, that's why their steps are more awkward than usual, edit, because the ladder was hooked on the leg

  • Rooster Original
    Rooster Original

    Hahaha cant wait til you debunk it by looking into it :)

    • Atlas
      Atlas

      @DrCash7 there really isn't

    • DrCash7
      DrCash7

      @Atlas nOtHinG to DeBuNK heRe FolKS

    • Atlas
      Atlas

      There's nothing to debunk.

  • britshell
    britshell

    How? miniatures and a sound stage...

  • mikenco
    mikenco

    That was fascinating! Very few people are qualified to call Neil Armstrong an idiot! lol

  • The Internet
    The Internet

    I think what you're saying, that we need to learn about *why* decisions were made, is really the root of the "teach a man to fish" adage, and it's such a huge issue with the way I see things being taught. Don't give people the answer, give people the tools to find the answer.

  • Phineas G
    Phineas G

    Folks at NASA are probably taking notes rn.

  • Black Panther
    Black Panther

    Why does the velocity have to be zero upon landing? Why not near zero?

  • Lavalambtron
    Lavalambtron

    You're making it too easy for tomorrow's kids, they will look like geniuses but instead it was all on youtube.

    • Some Ones
      Some Ones

      The power of technology.

  • Laura White
    Laura White

    never went to the moon brah. hash tag moon landing hoax

    • Atlas
      Atlas

      @Laura White I have better things to do than watch conspiracy videos. That said, I never came across a good hoaxer argument.

    • Laura White
      Laura White

      Atlas gee what a convincing retort Atlas. See “American Moon” on YT and then try to tell me it’s not possible that something’s up with the official narrative.

    • Atlas
      Atlas

      wrong

  • David Madsen
    David Madsen

    You are truly a treasure! I so appreciate all of your videos, they are some of the most wholesome and informative media out there.

  • Ian Thornton
    Ian Thornton

    1:58

  • Asophos
    Asophos

    1:58 amongus

    • Some Ones
      Some Ones

      😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳

  • Wyrylka
    Wyrylka

    1:44 I can't take this anymore make the pain stop

    • Bears
      Bears

      Kinda sus

  • Aidan Gavin
    Aidan Gavin

    1:45

  • Konnies Egg
    Konnies Egg

    Thanks for the tutorial, just got invited to a Martian party. Heading out tomorrow night.

  • goutvols103
    goutvols103

    Another great video. It would be interesting to know more about the rocket motor that was on the lander and got it back to the orbiter. I had read something where the NASA engineers made it as simple as possible; without any electrical connections to reduce points of failure. It was basically just a mixing of two (2) chemicals by means of the turning of two (2) mechanical valves. Thanks in advance.

  • Carl Carter
    Carl Carter

    I flew a test device in Grumman hangar 5 over a mosaic set of lunar photos. All I had was a mockup of the LM cockpit. I made 3 test landing attempts for evaluation data. 50 years later I toured the hangar at the Cape Canaveral facility and in an alcove next to the Saturn V rocket was the same unit I tested at the Grumman facility. I worked at Grumman for 30+ years on the A-6 Intruder , the F-14 Tomcat,and The JSTARS . Fun years!

  • The Obsolete Man
    The Obsolete Man

    There's only three ways to go to the Moon, or one. Step one, resurrect Stanley Kubrick. Step two, rent al large studio in the desert. Step three, buy all media and political influencers to give it credibility. Or Get a bunch of wicked smaht guys to get'em there.

  • Traci Wagnon
    Traci Wagnon

    U said among us a lot

  • lungotevere
    lungotevere

    Excellent. Great job. I know a lot more about lunar landing than I did before watching this. Sign me up!

  • Tampa Blush
    Tampa Blush

    1:59 among us

  • Tampa Blush
    Tampa Blush

    1:45 amongus

  • Jeremy Hopkins
    Jeremy Hopkins

    1:45

  • Bradyn Austin
    Bradyn Austin

    Boots on the moon.

  • JPazer
    JPazer

    1:45 , 1:59

  • JPazer
    JPazer

    1:45

  • Derrick Fyffe
    Derrick Fyffe

    Hey, I know this video is about the moon, but I have had this question on my mind for a while now, and the recent Mars landing has brought it back again (and I can't think of anyone else to ask) so here goes... This is regarding the 7 minutes of terror: Do you think that it is possible for NASA to build signal amplifiers that would be strategically placed between Mars and Earth, and these would boost the signal enough to reduce the delay in communication time? Or is this still too far in the future? I'm thinking 2 or 3 satellites spaced evenly across the distance whose purpose is to catch and slingshot the signals back and forth... Thank you for your response (provided you get this message, or for anyone else who may have a theory/answer).

    • Atlas
      Atlas

      The delay is because of the finite speed of light. There's nothing that can be done about that.

  • Chinmoy Kathar
    Chinmoy Kathar

    Don't you think the next lander will have highly AI assisted landing if not completely AI assisted landing? Although I agree that manual intervention from the onboard astronauts might be necessary and hence the training on earth is necessary.

  • Travis Weide
    Travis Weide

    I WANNA SEE THIS CARTOON! MAKE IT HAPEN!

  • Peter Hoare
    Peter Hoare

    What a brilliant video. Thank you.

  • Sadrho Gollsodia
    Sadrho Gollsodia

    I couldnt find video of the crane attached llrv anywhere else. Where did you get the LLRF-LLRV footage, if you can/want to answer?

  • Mac Kettner
    Mac Kettner

    Never heard of the X14 either - wow.

  • curtusw
    curtusw

    Thank you for that video that was awesome I am a space not even though I am not able to go into space but that is so cool that we had that and I bet if we go back to the moon like they want us to we need that version of or a new version of training aid

  • JustJoe Oleson
    JustJoe Oleson

    Thanks, dude.

  • D. Skučas
    D. Skučas

    1:44 ⠀⠀⠀⡯⡯⡾⠝⠘⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢊⠘⡮⣣⠪⠢⡑⡌ ⠀⠀⠀⠟⠝⠈⠀⠀⠀⠡⠀⠠⢈⠠⢐⢠⢂⢔⣐⢄⡂⢔⠀⡁⢉⠸⢨⢑⠕⡌ ⠀⠀⡀⠁⠀⠀⠀⡀⢂⠡⠈⡔⣕⢮⣳⢯⣿⣻⣟⣯⣯⢷⣫⣆⡂⠀⠀⢐⠑⡌ ⢀⠠⠐⠈⠀⢀⢂⠢⡂⠕⡁⣝⢮⣳⢽⡽⣾⣻⣿⣯⡯⣟⣞⢾⢜⢆⠀⡀⠀⠪ ⣬⠂⠀⠀⢀⢂⢪⠨⢂⠥⣺⡪⣗⢗⣽⢽⡯⣿⣽⣷⢿⡽⡾⡽⣝⢎⠀⠀⠀⢡ ⣿⠀⠀⠀⢂⠢⢂⢥⢱⡹⣪⢞⡵⣻⡪⡯⡯⣟⡾⣿⣻⡽⣯⡻⣪⠧⠑⠀⠁⢐ ⣿⠀⠀⠀⠢⢑⠠⠑⠕⡝⡎⡗⡝⡎⣞⢽⡹⣕⢯⢻⠹⡹⢚⠝⡷⡽⡨⠀⠀⢔ ⣿⡯⠀⢈⠈⢄⠂⠂⠐⠀⠌⠠⢑⠱⡱⡱⡑⢔⠁⠀⡀⠐⠐⠐⡡⡹⣪⠀⠀⢘ ⣿⣽⠀⡀⡊⠀⠐⠨⠈⡁⠂⢈⠠⡱⡽⣷⡑⠁⠠⠑⠀⢉⢇⣤⢘⣪⢽⠀⢌⢎ ⣿⢾⠀⢌⠌⠀⡁⠢⠂⠐⡀⠀⢀⢳⢽⣽⡺⣨⢄⣑⢉⢃⢭⡲⣕⡭⣹⠠⢐⢗ ⣿⡗⠀⠢⠡⡱⡸⣔⢵⢱⢸⠈⠀⡪⣳⣳⢹⢜⡵⣱⢱⡱⣳⡹⣵⣻⢔⢅⢬⡷ ⣷⡇⡂⠡⡑⢕⢕⠕⡑⠡⢂⢊⢐⢕⡝⡮⡧⡳⣝⢴⡐⣁⠃⡫⡒⣕⢏⡮⣷⡟ ⣷⣻⣅⠑⢌⠢⠁⢐⠠⠑⡐⠐⠌⡪⠮⡫⠪⡪⡪⣺⢸⠰⠡⠠⠐⢱⠨⡪⡪⡰ ⣯⢷⣟⣇⡂⡂⡌⡀⠀⠁⡂⠅⠂⠀⡑⡄⢇⠇⢝⡨⡠⡁⢐⠠⢀⢪⡐⡜⡪⡊ ⣿⢽⡾⢹⡄⠕⡅⢇⠂⠑⣴⡬⣬⣬⣆⢮⣦⣷⣵⣷⡗⢃⢮⠱⡸⢰⢱⢸⢨⢌ ⣯⢯⣟⠸⣳⡅⠜⠔⡌⡐⠈⠻⠟⣿⢿⣿⣿⠿⡻⣃⠢⣱⡳⡱⡩⢢⠣⡃⠢⠁ ⡯⣟⣞⡇⡿⣽⡪⡘⡰⠨⢐⢀⠢⢢⢄⢤⣰⠼⡾⢕⢕⡵⣝⠎⢌⢪⠪⡘⡌⠀ ⡯⣳⠯⠚⢊⠡⡂⢂⠨⠊⠔⡑⠬⡸⣘⢬⢪⣪⡺⡼⣕⢯⢞⢕⢝⠎⢻⢼⣀⠀ ⠁⡂⠔⡁⡢⠣⢀⠢⠀⠅⠱⡐⡱⡘⡔⡕⡕⣲⡹⣎⡮⡏⡑⢜⢼⡱⢩⣗⣯⣟ ⢀⢂⢑⠀⡂⡃⠅⠊⢄⢑⠠⠑⢕⢕⢝⢮⢺⢕⢟⢮⢊⢢⢱⢄⠃⣇⣞⢞⣞⢾ ⢀⠢⡑⡀⢂⢊⠠⠁⡂⡐⠀⠅⡈⠪⠪⠪⠣⠫⠑⡁⢔⠕⣜⣜⢦⡰⡎⡯⡾⡽

    • Atlas
      Atlas

      spooky

  • Dick Riggles
    Dick Riggles

    Moon landings were faked, hate to break the news.

    • Brad Wooldidge
      Brad Wooldidge

      Ha! You’re an ignorant moron. You know NOTHING about the engineering involved.

    • Kyle Laurent
      Kyle Laurent

      Hate to break it to you but you are an idiot.

    • Dick Riggles
      Dick Riggles

      @Atlas Seriously, do some thinking and use logic...

    • Atlas
      Atlas

      Wrong.

  • Bastian Nyström
    Bastian Nyström

    Man I'm excited for this series!

  • W Bix
    W Bix

    tgagyg

  • Nate Shanks
    Nate Shanks

    This was such an amazing technical feat that mankind accomplished. Thank you for taking the time for making this video and doing in depth research, analysis, and interviews with folks that were involved in the space program. Side note: Sad to see almost 1k flat earthers have shown up.

  • Patrick Rudolph
    Patrick Rudolph

    I love getting smarter everyday with your videos

  • DeltaBravo
    DeltaBravo

    1:58

  • TP Productions
    TP Productions

    WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON .. OR SPACE AT ALL. GOD IS REAL AND THE EARTH IS FLAT.

    • Some Ones
      Some Ones

      Troller alert :|

    • Brad Wooldidge
      Brad Wooldidge

      Troll.

    • Skippy
      Skippy

      fool spotted

    • Kyle Laurent
      Kyle Laurent

      ****IDIOT ALERT****

  • langwaydpful
    langwaydpful

    Absolutely amazing! Keep it up

  • torrace12
    torrace12

    13:40 *the highest resolution on a film from the 60s ever?* what i mean is that the picture is sharp enough to compare to 480dp

  • Zach Attack
    Zach Attack

    It's disappointing I can't like this video more than once.

  • RoMadSan RodMadSan
    RoMadSan RodMadSan

    I read Mr. Collins abridged version of his book in Reader's Digest, in a 1974 edition, when I was young, and it is a wonderful book.